To ensure the ecosystem remains decentralized, independent, and secure, RWANFTFI relies on a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) governed by smart contracts. The developers cannot unilaterally alter system rules, access user funds, or manipulate balances.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://whitepaper.rwanftfi.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
What can the DAO decide?
For a proposal to be submitted to the DAO, it must be backed by at least 30% of the total token supply. For a proposal to pass and be executed on-chain, it requires a majority vote of 50%.30% to Submit
A proposal requires backing from at least 30% of total GovToken supply to be submitted.
50% to Pass
A majority vote of 50% is required for a proposal to pass and execute on-chain.
- Early termination of an “Accumulative Event”. The event itself (a 30-day period where users can claim expired accumulative balances, with a 180-day cooldown) is triggered from the admin panel — the DAO cannot initiate it, but can terminate it early through a vote.
- Triggering a Price Impact event, during which user earnings are routed to the DA Liquidity Pool to strengthen DA token backing and price stability.
- Changing smart contract parameters within the ranges fixed at deployment (see Contract Parameters).
- Authorizing the sale of a user’s entire business structure as an asset.
- Verifying and approving a user’s request to change their compromised financial wallet.
- Voting to block a specific user’s NFT (Freeze). When an NFT is blocked, the user loses access to the platform’s financial products. Unblocking is also executed exclusively through a DAO vote.
Proposal Threshold in Practice — Honest Disclosure: The 30% submission threshold is a single, supply-weighted bar; it does not partition voting power by role. In the current token distribution (RWANFTFI Corporation 30% + 20 Guardians at 3.5% each), the threshold is realistically reachable only by the Corporation acting directly, or by the Corporation together with a coordinated subset of Guardians. An individual Guardian holds well below 30% and cannot single-handedly submit a proposal under the current allocation. The team has formally acknowledged this in the audit response: by design, under the current allocation, only the Corporation has enough tokens to create proposals on its own, and there is no external delegation mechanism that would let smaller holders pool voting power off-chain to meet the threshold (see Voting Mechanics below). The on-chain bar itself remains 30% — what changes over time is the breadth of participants able to clear it. The Future Redistribution Plan (Corporation 30% + 20 Guardians at 1.5% + 80 Leaders at 0.5%) widens the coalitions that can together meet the threshold, progressively decentralizing proposal creation without lowering the threshold itself.
How does voting work?
The mechanics below describe how a proposal moves from submission to execution, and how voting power is held and rotated at the contract level.Voting Closes at Deadline
Voting on a proposal closes strictly at the deadline — never earlier. Reaching majority support before the deadline does not lock the outcome; additional votes (for or against) continue to be accepted until the timer expires.
Auto-Delegation, No Manual Delegation
GovToken auto-delegates voting power on transfer to the recipient. There is no
delegate() path to assign voting power to a third party — voting weight always tracks the current token holder.Voting on Succeeded proposals: Even after a proposal has accumulated enough support to be considered “succeeded” on its current tally, the voting window remains open until its deadline. Every eligible holder retains the ability to register a confirming or opposing vote up to the moment the window closes — early-succeeded status does not curtail participation.
No external delegation. Because GovToken does not expose a manual delegation mechanism, smaller holders cannot pool their voting power off-chain to clear the proposal threshold. The only way to move voting weight is to move the underlying tokens, and any such transfer auto-delegates to the recipient. This keeps the relationship between token ownership and governance authority direct and on-chain traceable.
DAO Authority Sync — single source of truth: The DAO authority that governs GovToken is not stored as a duplicate value inside GovToken. When the DAO authority is rotated via
setDAO() on the Diamond contract, GovToken reads the updated DAO address directly from the Diamond contract rather than relying on a separately maintained pointer. This eliminates the risk of the two contracts drifting into a split-authority state during a rotation — there is no window in which GovToken could honor a stale authority that the Diamond has already replaced.GovToken Overview
GovToken is the governance and voting token of the RWANFTFI ecosystem. It is an ERC20Votes token with a permanently fixed supply. No additional minting is possible after deployment. There is no inflation mechanism — the supply model is fully fixed.Fixed Supply
10,000,000 GovTokens. Permanently capped. No inflation.
Mint Disabled
Minting function permanently disabled after deployment. No hidden reserves.
On-Chain Governance
All governance actions executed through DAO voting. Full on-chain transparency and traceability.
How are GovTokens distributed initially?
The initial allocation of GovTokens was designed to balance operational control with decentralized governance participation.RWANFTFI Corporation
3,000,000 GovTokens (30% of total supply). Technology & product company. Holds strategic governance allocation for long-term ecosystem development.
20 Guardians
7,000,000 GovTokens (70% of total supply). 350,000 tokens per Guardian (3.5% each). Primary governance participants responsible for early-stage ecosystem stability.
How will governance decentralize over time?
The DAO governance model includes a structured decentralization roadmap. Over time, governance participation will expand from 21 wallets to up to 101 wallets — without minting new tokens. Redistribution does not create new tokens. Total supply remains permanently fixed at 10,000,000 GovTokens. Guardians gradually redistribute a portion of their allocation to qualified Leaders through DAO-approved governance procedures.RWANFTFI Corporation
3,000,000 GovTokens (30%). Unchanged.
20 Guardians
3,000,000 GovTokens (30%). 150,000 per Guardian (1.5% each).
80 Leaders
4,000,000 GovTokens (40%). 50,000 per Leader (0.5% each).
Guardians
Guardians are the primary governance participants of the RWANFTFI DAO. They are responsible for maintaining ecosystem stability during the early growth phase and ensuring proper governance execution.Governance Participation
Voting on all DAO proposals. Strategic ecosystem decisions. Protocol governance execution.
Security & Oversight
Security oversight and risk management. Treasury governance participation. Long-term ecosystem stability.
No Unilateral Control
All governance actions — including token redistribution, parameter changes, and account operations — require standard DAO governance procedures with 30% proposal threshold and 50% majority vote.
Supply Integrity & Security
Immutable Supply
Total supply permanently fixed at 10,000,000. No minting, no inflation, no hidden reserves. All tokens exist within the initial distribution allocation.
Governance Security
Multi-signature authorization for critical operations. Role-based governance permissions. DAO-based approval for any allocation changes.
Audit-Verified Guarantees
Total supply equals exactly 10,000,000 tokens. No mint function is callable after deployment. Token redistribution does not alter total supply. All token movements are recorded on-chain.
Governance Wallets
All governance token holders are publicly verifiable on-chain. Below are the designated governance wallets for the RWANFTFI DAO.- Corporation
- Guardians (20)
| # | Role | Wallet Address |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | RWANFTFI Corporation | 0x92abE89ba4FDD712C72a0e24907674B598b546f7 |